Why English Spelling Makes No Sense

If you’ve ever stumbled over words like colonel, knight, or phlegm, you’re not alone. English spelling has a reputation for being inconsistent, irregular, and downright baffling. Why do we write “through” one way, “threw” another, and “thru” on road signs? Why is “colonel” pronounced kernel?

The truth is, English spelling is less a logical system and more a patchwork quilt stitched together by history, conquest, and technological quirks. Let’s explore why spelling makes so little sense—and why we’re probably stuck with it.


Old English: A Logical Start

Before 1066, English spelling was relatively consistent. Old English used an alphabet with characters like þ (thorn) for “th” and ƿ (wynn) for “w.” Words were spelled phonetically: cniht (knight), hlaford (lord).

Had spelling frozen then, English might be as straightforward as Spanish. But history had other plans.


The Norman Invasion: French Influence

When the Normans conquered England in 1066, French became the language of the elite. French scribes brought new spelling conventions:

  • cw became qu (cwene → queen).
  • cniht became knight (keeping the k, though it went silent).
  • hlaford evolved into lord.

French words like justice, beef, mansion also poured in, further complicating spelling.


The Great Vowel Shift

Between 1400 and 1700, English vowels changed dramatically in pronunciation but not in spelling. This “Great Vowel Shift” explains why:

  • bite is pronounced with a long “i,” not a short one.
  • meet and meat sound the same, though spelled differently.
  • Words like knight kept letters no longer pronounced.

In short: spelling froze, but speech moved on.


Printing Press Problems

When William Caxton introduced the printing press to England in 1476, he faced choices. English had no standard spelling, so printers often:

  • Borrowed spellings from other dialects.
  • Added extra letters to justify column width (gh in though).
  • Imported inconsistent conventions from Dutch typesetters.

Thus, inconsistencies became baked into the written language.


Scholars and “Prestige” Spellings

During the Renaissance, scholars wanted English to look more like Latin and Greek. So they added “silent” letters to words to reflect their roots:

  • debt got a “b” (from Latin debitum).
  • island got an “s” (from Latin insula), even though it wasn’t there before.
  • receipt gained a “p.”

The result? A language with spelling choices that looked scholarly but sounded nonsensical.


Borrowed Words, Borrowed Chaos

English never stopped borrowing from other languages. And it often kept their spellings:

  • tsunami (Japanese)
  • genre (French)
  • fjord (Norwegian)

Instead of adapting them, English absorbed them wholesale, creating even more irregularities.


Attempts at Spelling Reform

Over the centuries, reformers tried to simplify English spelling. Notable efforts include:

  • Noah Webster (1806): Gave us American spellings like color (vs. colour), theater (vs. theatre).
  • George Bernard Shaw: Famously complained about spelling, pointing out that “ghoti” could be pronounced “fish” (gh = f as in tough, o = i as in women, ti = sh as in nation).
  • Spelling Reform Movements: Groups proposed alternatives like thru for through, but few caught on outside informal contexts.

English spelling proved too entrenched to overhaul.


Why We’re Stuck With It

  1. Global Communication: Changing spelling would confuse millions of readers and writers worldwide.
  2. Cultural Attachment: Odd spellings connect us to history and literature.
  3. Technology Reinforcement: Spell-checkers and autocorrect standardize existing spellings, not new ones.

Despite being irrational, English spelling is stable precisely because so many people share it.


The Upside of Weird Spelling

As frustrating as it is, irregular spelling does have some hidden benefits:

  • Etymology: Spelling preserves history. You can trace knight back to Old English roots.
  • Differentiation: Words like pair, pare, pear may sound the same but look different, avoiding confusion in writing.
  • Identity: The quirks of English spelling set it apart, making it distinctive.

Final Thoughts: A Beautiful Mess

English spelling is a monument to history, not logic. From silent letters to bizarre borrowings, it reflects centuries of conquest, scholarship, and change.

So the next time you grumble about why colonel isn’t spelled kernel, remember: the confusion isn’t a bug—it’s a feature of a language that never stopped evolving.

English spelling makes no sense. And that’s exactly what makes it fascinating.